http://adamriggins.disqus.com/enMon, 17 Mar 2008 08:17:17 -0000http://adamriggins.com/2008/02/08/question-of-the-day/#comment-19234490<p>I agree!</p>AdamMon, 17 Mar 2008 08:17:17 -0000http://adamriggins.com/2008/02/08/question-of-the-day/#comment-5022578<p>I agree!</p>AdamMon, 17 Mar 2008 08:17:17 -0000http://adamriggins.com/2008/02/08/question-of-the-day/#comment-19234491<p>harsh.. too harsh... in this case, what the law is trying to say is for Sejas to prove herself not guilty. whatever happened "to innocent until proven guilty"???</p>ifoundmeSun, 16 Mar 2008 21:19:15 -0000http://adamriggins.com/2008/02/08/question-of-the-day/#comment-5022579<p>harsh.. too harsh... in this case, what the law is trying to say is for Sejas to prove herself not guilty. whatever happened "to innocent until proven guilty"???</p>ifoundmeSun, 16 Mar 2008 21:19:15 -0000